top of page

Ridhima Gupta

My Project

Problem

​

As climate change accelerates, reducing the environmental footprint of buildings has become a pressing concern. Traditional buildings consume large amounts of energy for heating, cooling, lighting, and operations. Sustainable architecture, which focuses on renewable energy integration, emerges as a strategy to combat these challenges. By utilizing solar, wind, and geothermal energy sources, sustainable designs aim not only to reduce energy consumption but also to create healthier and more resilient environments for occupants.

 

Introduction

​

This meta-analysis examines three case studies of eco-friendly buildings on various college campuses. The study highlights specific sustainable architectural features that enable these buildings to minimize energy consumption and maximize efficiency. By analyzing these examples and conducting broader research, this project provides insights into the implementation of renewable energy integration in architectural design.

Case Studies Selected
Geisel Library (University of California, San Diego) - Built in 1970
Center for Computing & Data Sciences (Boston University)
Basecamp Lyngby (Technical University of Denmark) - Built in 2020


Methodology

​

Case Study Information
Geisel Library:

Concrete columns enhance insulation and aesthetics.
Passive solar design maximizes natural daylight.
Passive cooling techniques and natural ventilation reduce reliance on air conditioning.
Drought-resistant landscaping minimizes irrigation needs.
Center for Computing & Data Sciences:

Heating and cooling provided by geothermal wells.
Fixed shades enhance cooling during the day.
Triple-glazed windows improve insulation.
Non-toxic sealants promote indoor air quality.
Basecamp Lyngby:

Recycled materials used extensively in construction.
Rainwater harvesting supports irrigation and sewage systems.
Roof terraces and gardens enhance air quality and promote health.
Broader Research
The study also reviewed broader research findings on sustainable architecture to draw generalizable conclusions.

​

Conclusion

 

Passive Solar Design: Reduces energy consumption by up to 50%.
Green Roofs: Lowers cooling costs by 25%.
Insulation: High-performance materials improve thermal efficiency.
Water and Waste Management: Graywater recycling and low-flow fixtures minimize water usage.
Non-toxic Materials: Improves indoor air quality and fosters healthier environments.
These findings underscore the importance of sustainable design in reducing environmental impact while fostering healthier and more resilient structures.

​

Acknowledgments

 

Special thanks to Mohit Nadkarni for his guidance on the content and formatting of this project, and Kavya Devani for her support with editing and review.

 

References

 

The Green Engineer. (n.d.). “Boston University Center for Computing & Data Sciences: Boston’s newest green landmark.” Retrieved from https://www.greenengineer.com/
Laskos, M. (2023, March 25). “BU’s newest building goes green for classes.” Boston University.
Basecamp Student. (n.d.). “Basecamp Lyngby: Sustainable accommodation in Copenhagen.” Retrieved from https://www.basecampstudent.com/
UC San Diego Libraries. (n.d.). “50 ways the Geisel Library is sustainable.”
Ashby, S. (n.d.). “Geisel Library – The balance between tradition and innovation.”

Contact

I'm always looking for new and exciting opportunities. Let's connect.

123-456-7890 

bottom of page